v28 #6 Adding Media, Adding Value

by Susan Doerr  (Assistant Director, Digital Publishing and Operations, University of Minnesota Press)

Author’s Note:  This article discusses the expanded media resources that may accompany a web-based, edition of a monograph and the impact the higher number of media brings to bear on a publisher’s time. — SD

Publishers have heard countless authors ask to include many images, tables, charts, even multimedia in their scholarly books and are used to saying, “Sorry, but it is not possible.  The print format and space constraints just don’t allow for that material.”  Today, with the creation of new digital platforms, the space and format constraints of print is becoming a thing of the past.  Those of us who are building these new platforms are realizing that more is not always better, and that more media can lead to higher costs.

Two digital publication platforms that are currently in development, Manifold, from the University of Minnesota Press, and Fulcrum, from Michigan Publishing at the University of Michigan Library — both funded by grants from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation — allow authors and publishers to expand the amount and types of media that can be included in a published project.  As more media are added, a press’ editorial and production staff, and the author, will spend more time preparing these media for publication.  At the University of Minnesota Press we were able to quantify the increase in the amount of time we spent on our first projects prepared for the Fulcrum and Manifold platforms, giving us an idea of how much more time we might expect to spend on this work.

Manifold, developed in collaboration with the GC Digital Scholarship Lab at CUNY and the digital development agency, Cast Iron Coding, is a platform being developed to publish a monograph as a dynamic web-based digital edition — the “Manifold edition.”  In the grant proposal for the Manifold platform we defined the characteristics of a Manifold edition as:

  • A book that makes visible its own process of creation (published iteratively, in pieces as the research and writing evolves) culminating in a formal, peer-reviewed Release Version;
  • A book that is versioned, while still allowing access to (and citations of) previous iterations of the text;
  • A book that enables access to the primary research documents and data;
  • A book that links to archives (either through hyperlinks or by embedding archival materials, as permissions allow);
  • A book that incorporates rich media, such as audio, video, and interactive game files;
  • A book that integrates scholarly conversations in social media channels;
  • A book that incorporates social reading practices such as reader feedback and critique (separate from peer review).

Enabling access to primary research documents and data, embedding or linking to archival materials, and incorporating rich media all require that editors and authors secure — and pay for — permissions, prepare and deliver media files to production staff, and create metadata for each item.  While we are not limited by technology to a maximum number of media that we can include in a Manifold edition, both the author and press staff are limited by the time that they can realistically devote to a project, and this imposes a limitation on the number of media we are able to include in a Manifold edition.

At the University of Minnesota Press we estimate that our editorial and production staff collectively spend approximately 20 to 30 minutes on each media resource that appears in a book.  This time is spent working with the author to determine if permission is required for illustrative content, quoted texts, and previously published chapters of works and securing required permissions;  working with the author on captions;  and adding information to our rights and permissions logs within a manuscript’s record in our database.

Securing permission is a hybrid responsibility.  Many university presses ask that authors seek permission and pay any licensing fees required by the copyright holder.  The press is responsible for maintaining permissions records and adhering to the restrictions imposed by the copyright holder.  In practice, editorial staff often advise authors about when/if permission is needed and provide template letters and forms for requesting and granting permission.  The Association of American University Press offers a 21-page permission FAQ for authors and university presses (http://www.aaupnet.org/policy-areas/copyright-a-access/copyright-a-permissions/copyright-a-permissions), a document that both press staff and authors use in doing this work.

Creating metadata for media begins with the author.  At the University of Minnesota Press we provide authors with a permissions log in which they list all the media they wish to include in a book.  This document asks for the media’s title, creator, copyright holder, is permission needed, if so, was it obtained, caption, and location within the text.  Upon completion, the author sends the permissions log to the editorial assistant at the press who will add the information to the permissions log in our title database.  When media are published in a Manifold edition, or on a companion web site to a book (as on the Fulcrum platform), we must create additional descriptive metadata that is not part of our existing process.  This new metadata includes alt-text for accessibility, additional or new descriptive text because these media may be viewed without the context of the book’s text, adjustment to the captions to remove references specific to the print edition (i.e., “the image to the left”), DOI assignment and registration.

The University of Minnesota Press hired a graduate student from the History department to assist the authors and editorial assistant with securing permissions and generating metadata for the illustrative material in Canoes: A Natural History in North America by Mark Neuzil and Norman SimsCanoes has a companion website for its illustrative content, hosted on the Fulcrum platform.  Our graduate student spent approximately 80 hours completing the metadata spreadsheet required for the Fulcrum platform.  Canoes has 323 photos, maps, paintings, and other media, which means our graduate student’s 80 hours of work equaled approximately 15 minutes of time per item to create the metadata needed for Fulcrum.

Manifold adapted the Fulcrum metadata spreadsheet for media and the Digital Projects Editor at the University of Minnesota Press is presently at work to prepare the metadata and media for The Perversity of Things: Hugo Gernsback on Media, Tinkering, and Scientifiction by Hugo Gernsback and edited by Grant Wythoff for upload into the Manifold platform.  As we refine the process of composing the additional metadata required — as we build it into our routine workflow — we expect the time for metadata creation will be reduced by about one-third to half the amount of time our graduate student and Digital Production Editor have spent, or approximately seven to ten minutes per media item.  For a project with 323 media items this would equal 37 to 53 hours of staff time, or about a week of work.

For one or two projects an additional week of work can be absorbed by our existing staff.  The University of Minnesota Press publishes approximately 110 books per year.  If one-third of our list, or 36 projects, were to be published on dynamic platforms that required the creation of additional metadata this would equal 1,332 to 1,908 staff hours, or 33 and 48 weeks of time — almost a full time employee.  The amount of staff time we are able to allocate to working with an author on media permissions and metadata will be a significant factor in determining how many books we can publish as Manifold editions.

The conversation between author and editor about inclusion of media is both a curatorial and practical consideration of time.  Do all the media that an author proposes to include enhance a reader’s understanding and experience within this project, and if so, does it merit the time?  Not every scholar will have 300 media resources to publish in their project.  Not every project will benefit from the inclusion of 300 media resources, even when platforms like Manifold and Fulcrum are able to include them.

University of Minnesota Press author John Hartigan, in his blog post, “Writing the Continuous Book,” http://www.uminnpressblog.com/2014/11/upweek-writing-continuous-book.html says, “The best part is that though I keep accumulating more material than I know what to do with, my anxieties over what to do with it all are dissolving.  I’m just watching what unfolds and trying to learn from it all, rather than worrying about how it will fit in the next book — or anticipating all that won’t make it between the next set of covers.”  Platforms like Manifold and Fulcrum will allow authors like John to include many of the materials they are accumulating in their published projects.  We believe that when selected thoughtfully more media will enrich a reader’s engagement with a scholar’s work.  The addition of more media in a Manifold edition will be a meaningful investment of both the author’s and press staff time and effort.  Our challenge then, is to make this work an efficient part of our workflow.

 

Pin It

Comments are closed.