<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATG &#8220;I wonder&#8221; Wednesday: Do you think that the concept of an electronic  &#8220;database&#8221; is well-defined?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.against-the-grain.com/2012/09/atg-i-wonder-wednesday-do-you-think-that-the-concept-of-an-electronic-database-is-well-defined/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.against-the-grain.com/2012/09/atg-i-wonder-wednesday-do-you-think-that-the-concept-of-an-electronic-database-is-well-defined/</link>
	<description>Linking librarians, publishers and vendors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:36:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katina Strauch</title>
		<link>http://www.against-the-grain.com/2012/09/atg-i-wonder-wednesday-do-you-think-that-the-concept-of-an-electronic-database-is-well-defined/comment-page-1/#comment-41250</link>
		<dc:creator>Katina Strauch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.against-the-grain.com/?p=18620#comment-41250</guid>
		<description>What can we do to clarify this. I should know this but is some organization like NISO working on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can we do to clarify this. I should know this but is some organization like NISO working on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.against-the-grain.com/2012/09/atg-i-wonder-wednesday-do-you-think-that-the-concept-of-an-electronic-database-is-well-defined/comment-page-1/#comment-41162</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.against-the-grain.com/?p=18620#comment-41162</guid>
		<description>Great question and my answer is &quot;Absolutely not.&quot;  We tend to use it for pretty much anything electronic/online, with info in it, is searchable, and is something we&#039;d put in our collection.  Besides the fuzziness of some of those criteria, it gets a little vague when we&#039;re dealing with size:  if it&#039;s big then probably, but if it&#039;s small then it might be an ebook or reference site or something like that.  Then there are other things that some people include and some don&#039;t:  data/statistics packages, full text journal collections, ebook collections, etc.  It&#039;s just used as a catch-all but the damage is be done when (1) we use it for our patrons who have no clue (or a different clue) as to what we mean and (2) it stops us from thinking about these resources in more meaningful ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question and my answer is &#8220;Absolutely not.&#8221;  We tend to use it for pretty much anything electronic/online, with info in it, is searchable, and is something we&#8217;d put in our collection.  Besides the fuzziness of some of those criteria, it gets a little vague when we&#8217;re dealing with size:  if it&#8217;s big then probably, but if it&#8217;s small then it might be an ebook or reference site or something like that.  Then there are other things that some people include and some don&#8217;t:  data/statistics packages, full text journal collections, ebook collections, etc.  It&#8217;s just used as a catch-all but the damage is be done when (1) we use it for our patrons who have no clue (or a different clue) as to what we mean and (2) it stops us from thinking about these resources in more meaningful ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>